January 28, 2008
Ovarian Cancer
Cancer of the ovaries occurs in about 1 in 50 women over the age of 50 or so. While not that common, the disease is troublesome because it is difficult to diagnosis early and most forms of ovarian cancer are highly malignant, spreading quickly. Thus there has been an interest in detecting the causes of ovarian cancer and perhaps preventing it.
January 28, 2008
Most of these studies are case-control designs. Here women with diagnosed ovarian cancer are interviewed about possible risk factors. Their answers are compared with answers to the same questions by women without ovarian cancer. These types of studies provide the most of the evidence we have, but are fraught with difficulties: For example, people with a particular condition may remember past events they think might have caused their illness more frequently than people without the condition or illness. A bias (recall bias) results, distorting the true picture and creating a false association and a misleading risk factor.
In this week’s issue of The Lancet evidence is summarized from 48 different case-control and prospective studies that included questions about past or present use of oral contraceptives. The evidence is coherent and consistent across all studies and in the two research designs (case control and prospective): Women who reported using oral contraceptives had a lower risk of developing ovarian cancer. The risk ratio was 0.42 (about a 60% reduction in risk) for women who had reported using oral contraceptives for 15 years or more. Of great interest, the protective effect of taking oral contraceptives early in life, persists for years after a woman has stopped taking them. A podcast by one of the authors and a Lancet editor is available free.
Implications
For an individual woman:
As ovarian cancer is relatively rare, the chances of benefit for any one woman are small. For example if 250 women took oral contraceptives for 10 years, 1 case of ovarian cancer would be prevented.
There are hazards of oral contraceptives - mainly deep vein thrombosis (clots in the veins in the legs and abdomen) which may lead to pulmonary emboli and death, but these events are extremely rare especially with the newer low estrogen dose contraceptive pills. Oral contraceptive use has also been linked, but not strongly, with other cancers, particularly breast and cervical cancer - although the latter is most likely confounded (misleading) because we now know that it is caused by several papilloma viruses, themselves associated with more frequent sex (and now potentially preventable with the new vaccines).
And there are benefits. Oral contraceptives are the most effective form of birth control and prevention of unwanted pregnancy and even more unwanted abortions, (both of which carry substantially higher health risks than oral contraceptives).
For society:
The widespread use of oral contraceptives in high and middle-income countries means that millions of women are taking them. Thus even if the benefits of risk reduction for a single woman are small, for all women, as many as 300,000 cases of ovarian cancer will be prevented by use of oral contraceptives. This is an argument for making oral contraceptives more easily available throughout the world. Indeed, The Lancet editors have called for making the pill available over the counter, without a physicians prescription.
Cautions
This research was carefully done by experienced epidemiologists. Nonetheless, the fundamental problem with cancer prevention research on humans, is that we have to rely on non-experimental information. Thus, it remains possible that some other factor, unknown to the women or to the researchers, may have led women who were unlikely to ever get ovarian cancer to be more likely to use oral contraceptives, and women, more likely to get ovarian cancer, less likely to use them. We have no way of knowing if this bias exists.
Warnings
Women with previous deep vein thrombi, migraines, heart disease or liver disease should probably not take oral contraceptives, or at least should discuss this with their physicians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovarian_cancer
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ovariancancer.html
http://podcast.thelancet.com/audio/lancet/2008/9609_26january.mp3
6 comments:
My wife has questioned the statement that 1 in 50 women will develop ovarian cancer and taken issue with the phrase "While not that common".
The lifetime incidence of ovarian cancer is 1.4 per 100 women, (or 1 women in 70). http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html
In comparison 1 women in 10 will develop breast cancer. I agree that writing: "While not that common" is unhelpful and misleading. John
new viagra viagra for sale without a prescription viagra australia viagra australia levitra vs viagra viagra cheap buy online buying viagra viva viagra viagra for cheap viagra attorneys viagra liver damage cheap generic viagra super viagra pro viagra effects on women
Dear Webmaster,
Pathology.org is the largest up to date informational database consisting of general health and disease information. The only way to combat disease and promote healthy living is to provide the public current information on health and diseases. Pathology.org consists of breaking news in the health world and offers the information needed to take preventive and combative measures to fight disease. Your website seems to be a very credible resource and would beneficial to us in the fight to combat the contraction and spread of disease. You can aid us in this fight by simply putting a banner or link up for us, making our site available to your vast public. I have included the code for the banner within this email showing you exactly what this banner will look like. Thank you for your time, effort, and work you have done, we look forward to any thoughts you may have.
Pathology.org is awarding you as top resource and if you would like to get the banner, please email me back with the subject line as your URL to avoid Spam and also to make sure that you only get the banner.
To be a adroit charitable being is to procure a make of openness to the world, an skill to group aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly outermost circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly outstanding about the condition of the righteous compulsion: that it is based on a corporation in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a sparkler, something fairly tenuous, but whose extremely particular attraction is inseparable from that fragility.
n everyone's sustenance, at some pass‚, our inner foment goes out. It is then break asunder into enthusiasm by an encounter with another benign being. We should all be indebted for the duration of those people who rekindle the inner inclination
In harry's time, at some time, our inner foment goes out. It is then burst into zeal beside an be faced with with another benign being. We should all be glad for those people who rekindle the inner spirit
Post a Comment